Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!
View source for Talk:Shamala Outfit (F)
|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Fixing Template||2||01:28, 28 December 2012|
|picture||9||06:52, 26 December 2012|
Okay, template is near finished. One hiccup though - if someone can take a look and fix where I went wrong that'd be great. All that needs to be done is fixing the limitations to show that elf and giant females can wear this.
I know many people didn't see it, and I can't blame you for it, but please, refrain from trying to use other equipment templates to create one for other pieces of equipment that may not already have information in it.
I can see where that's coming from, and I can try to avoid it in the future. I mainly got stuck with the limitations following a template from the DeadEiry project thing and one of the limitations showed, so I tried following another template from cloting with similar limitations to see if it would work (which it didn't). As for the information used in the equipment template, my main character has one of these outfits so all information is straight from what I see in-game.
it's kinda hard to see what it looks like with that character age. can we get a 17 y/o model?
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
- The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, staff, Editors in Training, Decepticons.
- Your username or IP address has been automatically blocked by MediaWiki.
The reason given is:
- Your IP address is listed as an open proxy in the DNSBL used by Mabinogi World Wiki.
- Start of block: 10:42, 30 March 2020
- Expiration of block: infinite
- Intended blockee: 188.8.131.52
You can view and copy the source of this page.Oneris (talk)
Return to Thread:Talk:Shamala Outfit (F)/picture/reply.
My character was age 10 o-o... How is it hard to see, I did full zoom and all parts are visible? Another alternative is clicking the image, if you can't see it then you probably need glasses.
It could just be the pose, but at your age, the large head obscures and clips straight through the neck part of the outfit. If you were any older, it most likely wouldn't have happened. And I needn't remind you of what happened to those Nuadha robe pictures. Overall, Age 10 and tin potions have a far higher chance of deforming the clothing.
Actually, I had worn the clothing at age 17 too. Also, I have no idea what the Nuadha robe pictures has to do with this o.o But what I'm trying to say is it didn't make any difference. I have an image if you want to see, although the clothing is dyed black. If you all want to ban age 10 characters modeling certain items then you will have a LOT of work to do, especially when it isn't needed.
I meant that your age-10 Nuadha robe pictures had a lot of clipping that wasn't present at age 17, and I'm sure that will also be the case for many other clothing, especially robes. I'm not asking to ban all age 10 characters since it is not always a problem, but it would be better for the wiki overall if it is discouraged and avoided when possible, especially on clothing that includes a hood, since the larger head size causes the hood to clip through the upper body.
I don't know about you guys but it looks fine to me regardless of the age. What matters is the outfit. My (M) pics were age 10 and they look alright.
I think another solution might be wearing an invisible weapon, such as a Tailoring Kit, that way, characters would have a neutral pose (And I remember something about leg positions in the Image Policy, too..) There are already people making GIFs for the poses anyway.
This right here. It is better to have the character with the "neutral" pose of standing straight, just as in the Male version of the Shamala Outfit, than it would be to have any pose, especially with Idle Poses from outfits.
Age 10 on some things (now that I look at the previous Nuadha Robe pictures ) is bad. Age 17 looks preferable, but might not always be required.