Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!

Reorganization pending.

Jump to: navigation, search

Also, can you ask the admins to make a post about their supposed decision you said they made? Most wiki users and wiki readers cannot hear these private conversations and do not want to take the word of semiadmins, rather hear some official announcement.

Kapra - (Talk)17:46, 12 June 2014

I asked Kadalyn last night and she thought we agreed to remove skipped content from this page and rename it to something like "foreign content" or something similar. In my opinion, this should include "unreleased content". There was no decision on an official name.

Saiyr (talk)18:01, 12 June 2014
 

So we keep a skipped content section just not use implicit euphemisms like "Skipped", say it is unreleased, like it is?

Kapra - (Talk)18:03, 12 June 2014

I'm not a fan of the word unreleased, either, because it could easily be misconstrued. But if by "section" you mean not on this page, then yes.

Saiyr (talk)18:09, 12 June 2014
 

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, staff, Editors in Training, Decepticons.


You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:Patches/Reorganization pending./reply (57).

My opinion is that it doesn't need clever nomenclature, so it could be an article called "Content on other regions" or "Patches in other regions" or "Patches (other regions)". It's a bit out of line with the typical page on this wiki, but it's pretty normal for other wikis. I proposed "foreign content" as the "clever" name, but I don't like it too much. I just came up with the (other regions) idea, but I think I like it. Regardless, it should focus on geographical naming rather than release state.

Edit: Actually, I guess using "Patches" implies a specific article structure like this one, so maybe it's not the best. Regardless, this is a minor detail and the name can always be changed later. Just pick a name for now.

Saiyr (talk)18:33, 12 June 2014
 

Permission to make a "Foreign Content" page immediately? Or should I wait until you guys come up with something more decisive?

Kapra - (Talk)18:47, 12 June 2014

Yes, go ahead and make it now. Details can be determined later. I'm closing this thread. A new one should be started to talk about reorganization with no discussion about foreign content.

Saiyr (talk)19:02, 12 June 2014