Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!

NOTICE: Seems like daily VIP shadow missions may be wrong occasionally!!

I'm blocking like thousands of bot accounts so if you were accidentally banned please get on the Discord and ping Kadalyn!

Thread history

From User talk:Kapra
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User Activity Comment
02:41, 29 May 2014 Blargel (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
02:39, 29 May 2014 Blargel (talk | contribs) Reply split to a new thread (Probably would be easy to put these in separate threads. I'd also like to keep Kadalyn's discussion with Kapra undistracted.)
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 02:41, 29 May 2014

(Split from another discussion. Originally a reply to Thread:User talk:Kapra/Curious/reply (5))

You're overanalyzing again. Just think of the situation directly. Apples are red. Crime is bad. Sharks are sort of cool. You don't need t write 3-4 sentences about any of those things. Marcus built a bridge. We don't need 3-4 sentences explaining what Marcus did, we just need to know that Marcus built a bridge. Whole point of wiki is to be clear and precise, so be clear and precise, write discussions like you would write a page on the wiki. "I don't like X because of Y." "I think X is the best solution because Y." "X is Y." "You could do X with Y."

Most importantly sometimes when X says Y is bad. Then Y is bad. Murder will never be good(an exaggerated example, but you get the point.) You don't have to explain some things any further because, well, Y is bad.

Making scenarios isn't any better, they're really long and I feel that you're only trying to drag on the discussion when it can be ended easily. You only make people repeat themselves over and over again, make clear questions, not analogies or hypothetical situations on what it is exactly someone wants. Because in most likely cases someone doesn't like something in your analogy and/or what-if situation and they will disagree with something in it.

Nise Panda (talk)05:18, 28 May 2014

This made me laugh, but sort of contradictory wording which is not helpful here. Your post is about conciseness, rather than preciseness. Precision would just incite Kapra to post more in order to cover every detail of the situation.

However, it's fair to bring up that conciseness is important. The basic principles are correct, understandable, concise, and useful (as in wanted by the typical reader). CUCU (coo-coo~!), yes, it's totally a new thing. =w=)b

EDIT: Oh I should mention this is more in relation to how one presents information. It's not always what you'd use in a conversation.

Kadalyn (talk)15:09, 28 May 2014