Abuse filter change

Did you actually add the 2000 delta requirement for a reason? It failed to detect the latest bot because the delta was negative. I don't think this requirement needs to be there at all.

Although the filter would have blocked it if that wasn't there, the actions of the user doesn't seem very much like a bot, though I could be wrong.. If it were a bot, it's quite a clever one.

What I meant to ask is, did a user actually come across an edit he/she needed to make that was made impossible by the filter? Also, the first edit that bot made was well below either limit at ~300 delta, IIRC.

None of the edits made by users that were blocked that I've encountered were major; most of them were trivial.

I'm going to remove the size limit, then.