Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!

Level 300?

Now you're just being annoying and offensive... >.>

It isn't surprising that Nexon/DevCAT tends to exclude important details. Are you saying that a reset time and the number of shadow crystals rewarded, especially when its written "Beginner Shadow Crystals", is not?

Infodude575 (talk)10:45, 3 January 2015

If you can find that information on either versions of this image, feel free to share it with us. Clearly you're seeing more than we are.

Otherwise, everything included in this image is already in the page.

IDSd (talk)11:12, 3 January 2015
 

Even before Doomsday giving the exact numbers. Shadow crystals was in plural.

The image doesn't even include the reset time 8D.

Sakura502 (talk)11:51, 3 January 2015
 

I don't know why you two are fighting over the picture. Since when have we ever relied on Nexon for details?

Doomsday31415 (talk)11:54, 3 January 2015
 

That ain't the issue.

It's Info wanting the image to be bigger on the page, when it provides no additional details, what so ever.

Sakura502 (talk)11:56, 3 January 2015

I see. Apparently the conversation changed later on, confusing me what the point was.

The picture should just be treated as a picture. The details are on the page, and the words on the picture aren't important. Furthermore, if you really want to read that text, you can just click on the picture to open the full size version.

Doomsday31415 (talk)12:03, 3 January 2015
 

Now I see what Sakura meant... However, I do not appreciate how she was being awfully vague to bring her point across, then belittle me for my lack of understanding. We're human, we make mistakes, but that doesn't warrant an act of disrespect.

I honestly wonder how many people with no wiki experience automatically know to "click the image". However, I am going to concede here.

Infodude575 (talk)12:48, 3 January 2015

Isn't is common in every browser to click a thumbnail to view the full size image? Google Images comes to mind.

Doomsday31415 (talk)13:28, 3 January 2015
 

TIL viewing an image requires wiki experience.

IDSd (talk)13:31, 3 January 2015
 

Your famous Wikipedia uses the same thing and same for every other wiki in existent.

And pretty much every image hosting sites.

Even Facebook to some degree.

Sakura502 (talk)13:31, 3 January 2015

Alright, I think he gets the idea.

The dead horse doesn't even look like a horse after all this beating.

Doomsday31415 (talk)13:39, 3 January 2015
 
Edited by author.
Last edit: 14:10, 3 January 2015

I simply love how you're always crying about people being disrespectful and rude to you, yet you have the conscience to talk smack about others behind their backs.

Please, stop being such an idiotic hypocrite. Feel free to talk smack in front of us.

IDSd (talk)13:49, 3 January 2015

Woah there, language.

Sakura502 (talk)13:58, 3 January 2015

It made it more exciting. :(

IDSd (talk)14:02, 3 January 2015
 
 
 

I don't understand how I was being vague.

Sakura502 (talk)12:53, 3 January 2015

You weren't. The issue exists within the other party.

IDSd (talk)13:18, 3 January 2015
 

"Everything is already on the page."

First glance it didn't seem relevant to the topic of why the image size shouldn't be increased. I tried to answer that, which led to derailing.

Infodude575 (talk)13:15, 3 January 2015
 

"No one cares how small that thing is. Everything is already on the page."

"I care. Can't exactly see much on my monitor or my mobile."

And then I repeat.

"Except, everything is already on the page."

So at this point, you should understand that: "Everything is already on the page." talks about the image.

and then.

"(No, not "everything"... Daily reset time and # of daily shadow crystals...)"

"Which the image doesn't even include." to which I replied with that. Talking once more about the image.

Even if you didn't get it the first time, repeating something three times is a bit.

Sakura502 (talk)13:18, 3 January 2015
 

I'm sorry, but do you automatically expect people to understand things by just repeating yourself...?

This topic is getting unnecessarily long.

Infodude575 (talk)13:36, 3 January 2015

You're the guy who I described as everything wooshing pass your head.

So yes, to some people, repeating is the only solution.

Especially because I'm not sure how much more I could simplify. "Image is useless, page has everything."

Sakura502 (talk)13:39, 3 January 2015
 

And, this topic is getting unnecessarily long.

Infodude575 (talk)13:43, 3 January 2015

What does that have to do with the issue at hand?

Or are you unable to follow such a simple top-down threading format?

IDSd (talk)13:43, 3 January 2015