Template talk:DataMonsterCromm Cruaich

How about, Cromm Cruaich --> Cromm Cruaich statue. Since the real Crom isnt the mosnter. -- Ember Incubus

It'd be an unnecessary hassle to rename/redirect/move pages to a new name when in-game the name's as it is now on the wiki. :S--Qaccy 20:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Not to seem rood, but that just screams lazy. -- Ember Incubus

Not really lazy...just why do it? The dragon's named Cromm Cruaich when you fight it in Baol, there's no "statue" anywhere in the name, regardless of whether it's more "correct" from a storyline standpoint.--Qaccy 21:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes but, you don't know that isnt the real Cromm until after its dead. That's why it didn't say statue. -- Ember Incubus

We already have the label (NPC) on the non-monster/statue Cromm Cruaich. I say we leave it as is. Also, "Cromm Cruaich (Statue)" seems to imply that it's an actual statue; as in, an inanimate object. And, in my opinion, it would seem silly to add (Monster) to the end of Cromm Cruaich on a monster template and page. At most, I'm going to add a link to Cromm Cruaich (NPC) on the Dragon page. --Aramet 21:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)