Should be updated to include G18 completion

“	Whatever happened to: "I would say you fail at logic, but that would be rude of me. Instead, I will explain 'why' you are incorrect."	„

My mood varies, time to time, day to day, argument to argument. However, I do not consider those rude when I already explained why you were wrong.

“	The quote could be used as evidence that upcoming updates will not be called Generations. Keyword updates, not storylines. I did not say that included the Saga or the "G18" update.	„

As far as I could tell, you were the one insinuating that the quote was part of your evidence for your claim that Generation 18's story "The Saga: Iria" was not actually the G18 story. If I misinterpreted you apologies, but, if I did not misinterpret you then does this mean your argument is essentially supported by one piece of evidence: that The Saga: Iria has not yet been officially called G18?

“	I am sorry if I implied I require you to find evidence to support that, rather, I said I require evidence that the Saga storyline (not the update it came out with/after) is called "Generation 18".	„

Sorry, bub. Occam's Razor eliminates unnecessary assumptions. Unless there is good reason to suggest that the status quo has changed, there is little to no reason to assume it has like you are. You are the one making the claim that the status quo has changed and the storyline released in Generation 18 is not actually the Generation 18 storyline.

“	I'm going to go on a short tangent and skip to a previous post of yours because I forgot to write this when I had time. There have been updates of arguably equal or greater size to the "G18" update since. Such as the Zero/Druid update.	„

With your... summarizing skills, I'd say you'd be a shoo-in for a position at Fox News. They always need people who are perfectly willing to distort the evidence and try to convince low-info people that they (Fox News) are the ones telling the truth.

I shall show you why you suffer from confirmation bias with an examples:

In Fairness

• "G18":
  • Added a new skillset (Dual Guns)
  • Added a storyline.
  • Made Demonic Items easier to obain.
  • New Items.
  • New Areas.
  • New Skills.
• Zero/Druid:
  • Altered magic skills.
  • Altered alchemy skills.
  • Changed Stat formulas.
  • New Skillz.

I mean, look at that. I applied similar summarizing techniques to the Zero/Druid update that you did to Generation 18, and look who's longer?

And, guess what, Season updates have been pretty big in the past. They have added new skills, new areas, changed stuff around... they aren't necessarily "tiny" or "minor" updates. If you followed your own typing you would have unwound your own argument without me having to do it for you.

This is why I view the Zero, Druid, Diva, Vate, et. all updates as a "Season" update, even if they are not named such.

“	What is not under question: The Saga came out in the updates following "G18". What is not certain without evidence: The name of updates, the name of storylines, and the name of "chapters".	„

I don't see why any of those are uncertain at this point. We have no evidence to conclude that The Saga: Iria is not to be referred to as Generation 18. We only have evidence that it has not been called that. Occam's Razor eliminates the unnecessary assumption that something is different unless evidence is shown otherwise.

“	If one find a new illness, and that illness seems to be similar chicken pox but is not caused by the same virus as chicken pox, you do not call it chicken pox.	„

Then you do not call it Chicken Pox because you have 'evidence' that it is not Chicken Pox, therefore (somewhat) bypassing Occam's Razor and agreeing with virtually everything I said on the subject of Occam's Razor.

Logic.

In order for this kind of scenario to happen in the current case, one has to provide evidence that Generation 18: The Saga: Iria is not actually called that. Burden of proof lies on those going against conventional thought, i.e. You.

“	We shouldn't call something a thing just because it would be consistent, we need evidence.	„

The only evidence that should be necessary is that you have little to no evidence that the pattern was broken. You assume it has. Occam's Razor eliminates unnecessary complications unless evidence is shown that a complication is necessary to explain the inconsistency.

So provide us with this evidence, Pyrus.