TIL

Correcting someone's grammatical error is being a jackass~

I'm sure you know I didn't delete it just because you were correcting grammar.

I'm sure you know that the first reply was literally just correcting grammar.

I'm sure you know the last reply was just saying "You're welcome" with an image attached.

I'm sure you know you could have skipped the deletion of the first two replies to the thread, since I'm guessing your problem was with the last.

Considering your history of attitude problems, I don't think I was being unreasonable. Even your triple post here is showing attitude.

It all depends on how you interpret it. I still see no justification for the deletion of the first reply, which was simply to help Infodude learn.

Then work on your phrasing so that other people don't misinterpret it. You're the only person currently that repeatedly has this problem.

“	"don't see none" = "see at least one"	„

Apparently, that to you means:

OMG YOU ARE SO STUPID! "DON'T SEE NONE" MEANS "SEE AT LEAST ONE", YOU IDIOT!

Or you can tell me what you interpreted it as.

In this particular case, yes, your words by themselves don't convey antagonism. However, given your history, it seemed more likely that you were just trying to give Info a hard time. After all, the majority of your offenses in the past were against Info or myself.

But hey, if you didn't intend to offend, then I'm sorry. You can't blame me for being on guard against a past troublemaker. You certainly have shaped up recently so perhaps I should trust you more.

I gotta agree with Blargel here (not that it matters much). If you had been helpful to his question AND corrected him that would've been seen as just being polite IMO, but all you did was correct him and added nothing else.

• shrugs*

You're telling me to answer a question to which I do not know the answer.

Then you should have not said anything. :)

It would have been irresponsible of me to let him continue to believe he was correct.