Methods

1/17 chance. That's not so bad... is it?

Except that on top of the ~5% chance, it's timed, it costs valuable time to jiggle around and find the eyes in the first place, and every wrong guess costs you 3-5 seconds just to get back to where you were, and they're moving. Rigged game is rigged.

Oh boy, this is harder than I thought. OMG STAP WALKING!

How much harder is Find Waldo than this?

Find waldo isn't animated. v .v

Aren't there like hundreds to thousands of people though?

Well it would be easier for a female to do than a male, as females look at entire pictures whereas males look at details, btu the fact that they're all smushed together and you are looking for very specific details, Find Waldo is much easier. But this event is just try and guess, because you are not given all the details until the very end.

"females look at entire pictures whereas males look at details"

wouldnt that make it easier for MALES since you have to look for specific details?

Not quite, if you send a guy to look for milk in a refrigerator, it will take a while unless he stands REALLY far form the doorway. Males would be looking at part of objects, rather than the entire thing. Males would be quicker to find if a milk is nonfat or half and half, but females would be faster to find the milk itself.

as for me personally, if i know what kind of milk is being asked for (if youre talking about in a store) i find that one immediately, and a woman finds it slower 99 times out of 100.

in a house, i find it even faster.

I must be a guy in my head then o_o I do both D:

Both do both, but which is greater depends on your neurology.

I am a male and if something doesnt look the same as the stuff around it that thing sticks out like a sore thumb. I have a FAR easier time finding lost objects than anyone else I know. I have no handicaps in terms of finding things based on single details.

Not to mention the hats make the hair cover his eyes