Can someone give me an example?

I noticed this line

Beware that there are some monsters that will always resist taming, even if the exact same monster can be tamed.

But I'm not sure of any animals that fit it.

I don't know for sure, but I think it means you may tame one successfully, but you may try to tame the same type of monster again and fail, in effect, still using one bait. It may also mean, certain horse monsters are tamable, but the Guardian of the Ruins' Horse is not.

If it's the first option, it's kinda stupid, since there's always a chance to fail.

if it's the second, then that's not the exact monster. :/

Alright, what I think the person meant is that while some instances of monsters are tameable, others aren't. They're not the exact same monster though, to the game they're two totally different things, but the name and appearenecs are the same. For example, Golems in Other Alchemist are all untameable. Normal golems are perfectly tameable.

So yeah, it's true enough.

What I think it implies is that animals of the exact same species (ex. Zebra) have some rebels that can't be tamed at all, no matter how long you try. While the other zebras around are tameable, you won't get a certain one, no matter how hard you try ever. That's just what my guild mate and I think.

I've never got that though. It may seem like somethings untameable, but it's all just luck in that regard. I've tamed a full HP Elephant the Head Figure in one try, and then gone on to use three stacks of bait on a 1/10th hp young elephant

No, he means like, the Hippos in the river and the Hippos in the swamp. Same name and appearance, but the river ones are untamable.

Which is what I suggested, kinda. But anyway, yeah, it makes sense. I was just wondering about it, and I coudn't think of anything at first.