"Does not consume Durability"

I'm not going to disagree with this. I've used it like 10 times in EMAC and my Dowra SEs still shows 20/20 durability.

But that function is extremely absurd. Sounds really glitchworthy, too.

No need to post threads indicating that you're not going to disagree; we'll know when you disagree when you abruptly undo an edit with no reason.

So I can't point out how incredibly absurd and ridiculous that function is?

In other words, you're accusing Kiyoura of vandalism/posting information without verification?

I never said that, its not nice to twist people's words.

I'm not twisting your words; I'm inferring what you're implying.

Also,

“	its not nice to twist people's words	„

Oh, the irony.

Also also, you haven't said you weren't. So...

I'm not inferring that. I'm inferring that for all we know it could be a glitch.
Gosh you love annoying the hell out of me don't you?

Implying*

If you're going to post a thread to "imply" a function is a glitch, you might want to "state" that, not "imply" it. In other words, my point still stands. I rest my case.

“	Gosh you love annoying the hell out of me don't you?	„

You have no idea. ^_^

It's not a glitch and intended. The fact that you two argue across space and time (...let me think about it) in several discussion pages kinda makes me wonder how much of this crap has escalated in the past...several months. While discussion is nice, I hate to see it get derailed shortly after.

But doing some tests, Way of the Gun does not consume Durability upon activation, nor duration.

“	what in the hell were you thinking when you typed that into this article?	„
—Kevin

So you're fine with it on this page, but not on the Durability page?

And yes, Mikaya, I agree with you there, these arguments are getting really annoying. And its all because of the Gods' fault! Curse them!

Thank you for completely ignoring us, despite everyone in else in this thread saying it should not be on the Durability page.

So, stuff like Elf Ranged Attack is not relevant either?

I would say skill specifics aren't relevant on the durability page. If we absolutely must have them on there, they should be in their own section. (That does not mean go put them in their own section now.)

Because it has to do with this skill.... oh wait. Infonogi: place irrelevant information everywhere. I always forget.

How is it irrelevant? The skill directly affects the function.

That's like saying Holy Water of Lymilark is irrelevant.

I agree, it should go on the Way of the Gun page but not the Durability page. If we include this on the durability page, we might as well include things like "Open Umbrella does not consume Umbella's durability" on the Durability page, and that would get way too messy.

If you started such a thing on the Durability page, he would totally follow along. He's like a lost dog.

There's a difference between affecting and ignoring.

Not to mention, durability is not a function.

╬≖ ̭≖．．．

Durability should not have a mention of Way of the Gun. It shouldn't matter if it is on the durability. only reason holy water is relevant is because it directly affects durability loss. Durability should be left alone as is, as it is irrelevant on what skills consume X durability, and it isn't fixed loss anyways. Durability should be reserved for explaining what it is, base loss rates on normal usage, what affects durability loss, such as factors like time or holy water/flame.