Pajama Set (F)

The hat on the back and angled views is cropped off, because it helps keep the hair away which was preferred in the image policy. For the side view, the hair really isn't blocking anything on the side that it is showing. The front view may be replaced, although only a teensy weensy bit of the hair is covering one little strap, and apparently that's horribly wrong according to you.

Actually, the only thing "horribly wrong" to me with this situation is the fact that instead of uploading newer versions of the screenshots and avoiding a reverting war, images keep getting reverted to previous verions that have already had their flaws point out.

"The front view may be replaced, although only a bit of hair is covering one strap." You also forgot the fact that the hair can be distracting. (I took out some of the useless words in the quote since all those words did was justify your screenshots, even though there are issues with them)

I have never had a complaint about my hair being "distracting", it is part of the game and that's like saying anyone with hair is distracting? As long as the hair does not cover a big part of the outfit, it is fine.

Scroll up and you'll see me mentioning that bit about distracting hair in a reply to Vanstina's message. Try not to blow things out of proportions. You're taking what I said about one picture and applying it to everything.

"As long as the hair does not cover a big part of the outfit, it is fine." So what you're trying to say is that even if someone were to take screenshots of the set that is of equal quality/zoom to yours, but it doesn't have any part of the set blocked by hair, they shouldn't replace your image (since it isn't a big deal to you, and it's only a teensy weensy bit blocked)?

It shouldn't have to BE replaced since nothing is wrong with it o.o

"The front view may be replaced, although only a teensy weensy bit of the hair is covering one little strap" That quote kind of says otherwise. >.>; If there was nothing wrong with the screenshots, then this wouldn't have started in the first place.

That aside, images get replaced if there's a better version available. Whether it's due to consistency issues, lighting, color of the gear, resolution, zoom, the list goes on. There may not be anything wrong with an image - until someone uploads a better one. (That's if there's nothing wrong with a screenshot that's getting replaced)