Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!
Talk:Andras's Bow
Is this bow usable by humans as well or is it Elf Specific? - Miyuna
- Usable by both Humans and Elves. A no-go for Giants though. :P --Js16 02:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Egoability
Just wondering on whether this can be ego'd or not. I highly doubt it, but you never know. ~Zallist 20:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Is it just me...
Is it just me or is this bow completely useless unless someone doesn't know how to upgrade weapons? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fracture (talk • contribs) . Please always sign your comments with the button or by typing ~~~~!
- It says on the page that is has 0 upgrades? Is that what you're trying to say? --Jαy 23:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- I believe the unsigned person is trying to say that without the upgrades the bow is troublesome to use. I`m also certain that person didn`t notice that it`s got Zero upgrades... >_>
- The bow is stronger then a normal un-upgraded Elven Long Bow, along with higher Crit, it's a good back-up bow (as well as a collector's item) for those people who Prof Bows for sale and ego-repair. Not everyone bothers to upgrade their weapons. --Junjun 00:29, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- some people don't like to upgrade. ^^; it's why they like the hooked cutlass so much. Also I think they think it looks cool. (I don't understand it either...) -- ladywinter ~{talk page}~ 15:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
image
daylight image please -- ladywinter ~{talk page}~ 15:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Andras' Or Andras's?
I think grammatically speaking it's supposed to be Andras' Bow but knowing Nexon they well might have called it Andras's Bow. Could someone clear that up? --\(°∀°)/ 14:41, 26 October 2010 (PDT)
- It's spelled Andras's Bow in-game. And Andras's is actually grammatically correct; the first 's' is part of her name, Andras, and the second refers to her possession. However, this is the "old-fashioned way" (with the exception of certain names such as Socrates'). People often omit the second 's' now. --Ryo (Talk) 16:35, 26 October 2010 (PDT)
- Ok XD That was a bit confusing but all-righty just making sure ><; --\(°∀°)/ 16:51, 26 October 2010 (PDT)
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]