Too much speculation and personal opinion

First of all, it's not biased, and everyone voted. Akira brought up the idea so she's obviously voting for it, Infodude and I voted for it, and you clearly seem to be against it which is overruled by a majority. Proof of ancestry: Elatha's bloodline should be obvious. The Gatekeeper's bloodline is stated by him when speaking to him outside of G12. (End chat and talk again for different results.)

Also, please don't insult me or anyone on this wiki. That is rude and comments like "You're not even trying to work with me, just yourself," are straightforward insults and moreso insulting than anything that can be implied.

My point is, fact is fact. If the game mentions it in one place, it deserves to be on the wiki. If it is contradicted in another place, it still deserves to be on the wiki in that spot with a notation of it.

It is biased because you're for it (this is the very definition of bias) and you don't even know who "everyone" is. Shall I count the votes from the IRC from the members that detest what you're doing? To quote you, "fact is fact" (and on this matter, the only fact for you is that someone calls [being] a god, this isn't the same as "fact: [being] is a god"). You're not cooperating and you're acting on your own without proper consultation as evidenced by your reinstating Cromm/Glas/Lugh and the "Descendant of Gods" even whilst discussion is still ongoing. This is ignoring that a poorly thought out vote isn't even a good measure in this case. And no, it doesn't. To do so can be misleading and misinformative. This is precisely why we're having this discussion and the points I stated above are why I'm constantly repeating myself and retreading the same ground. You've even be told before by mabiworld staff to keep conjecture, speculation and personal opinion off the actual pages and solely on the discussion pages. I can find this for you again if you have trouble remembering.