Too much speculation and personal opinion

Uh yes my post is gone and you don't even know what you're talking about (and for the record, "your post" not "you're post"). What happened was that the message that was being written disappeared before it could be saved. It's very clearly not on the talk page.
And you're confusing the issue. What was going on here was that people were saying that "lugh is a god" as fact. This is NOT a fact as I've said multiple times over. The fact is that some people called him a God and seemingly without any basis. If you can't even understand why this matters then you're not qualified to comment on the issue.

You're the one not seeing the basis after it being stated multiple times from multiple sources. You claim everyone's opinions "still counts and that should be recognised" yet you are trying to disqualify posts? (Also, I don't see the point in correcting grammar or spelling mid-debate, you yourself misspelled recognized.)

I am sorry if my or others responses aren't as quality as they can be, but that's the best you can do online and moving it to another form of conversation won't make a difference. Can we please skip the tangent on location of this conversation and hold it here for the meantime?

The importance of an NPC is irrelevant. If it says something somewhere in the game then it does say it in the game. You seem to be avoiding the subject of keeping at least a mention on the wiki.

You're the one not seeing the basis after it being stated multiple times from multiple sources.
I've addressed this before (multiple times in fact). Clear, solid proof. What you have produced is not that and I've explained why it's not yet it get parroted as if I haven't said anything.
You claim everyone's opinions "still counts and that should be recognised" yet you are trying to disqualify posts?
When I think the reasoning is faulty, yes. That's kinda how debating works. You make logical and well reasoned statements to further your point and discard statements you think aren't logical or well reasoned. As far as I can see many of the statements for your side are horrendous.
(Also, I don't see the point in correcting grammar or spelling mid-debate, you yourself misspelled recognized.)
1) Standards are always important and 2) British English says hi.
I am sorry if my or others responses aren't as quality as they can be, but that's the best you can do online and moving it to another form of conversation won't make a difference. Can we please skip the tangent on location of this conversation and hold it here for the meantime? We already dealt with this. Good job on picking it up again.
The importance of an NPC is irrelevant
That's basically what I just said.
You seem to be avoiding the subject of keeping at least a mention on the wiki.
I'd suggest you stop assuming because you're terrible at it. I'm not avoiding anything and if you ask me a mention on the wiki is warranted. Ever since the beginning what I said was that I don't want "[being] is a god" when it's questionable. Lugh's page itself has a mention of how he is referred to mostly as a knight and rarely as a god (which could probably use some fixing) and I'm fine with that because that's how it is. So yes, a mention is fine. How those "mentions" are constructed is my issue and always has been.

As far as I can see many of the statements for your side are horrendous. That is why I apologized, because that was not my intention and I'm trying the best I can.

How those "mentions" are constructed is my issue and always has been. So in your opinion, in terms of Lugh, this debate is about the value of the mention? (It being a note at the bottom of the page or it being in the list?)