cluttered skill details

The skill details per rank should probably be placed into a table when someone has the time to do it :x

It does seem cluttered now that I look at it...

Well I got...this:

Rank	F	E	D	C	B	A	9	8	7	6	5	4	3	2	1
Knockdown Gauge Difference (%)	>40	>40	>40	>40	>40
Engagement Chance (%)	20	40	60	80	100

It gets tricky at A+ o.e I don't quite know how to put it...

At rA+, the chance drops if the enemy gauge is the same as the player's gauge. So if both were at 0% filled, the chance would be placed in brackets or something. I forgot to add that at r5+, the skill can kick in even if the monster wasn't fighting anything to begin with. work against multiple attackers. (I need sleep o-e)

So like this for ranks A-6:

Rank	F	E	D	C	B	A	9	8	7	6	5	4	3	2	1
Knockdown Gauge Difference (%)	>40	>40	>40	>40	>40	≠ [=]	≠ [=]	≠ [=]	≠ [=]	≠ [=]
Engagement Chance (%)	20	40	60	80	100	100 [20]	100 [40]	100 [60]	100 [80]	100

I'm shooting blanks at this point...feel free to pick this up o.e

Rank	F	E	D	C	B	A	9	8	7	6	5	4	3	2	1
Engagement Chance (%) Knockdown Gauge Difference = 40%	20	40	60	80	100
Engagement Chance (%) Knockdown Gauge Difference = 0%	-	-	-	-	-	20	40	60	80	100
Engagement Chance (%) (At any time)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	20	30	40	50

This is what I have. Let me know if anything doesn't make sense.

OH...that's actually much more understandable. o.o

I would suggest something like this:

Rank	F	E	D	C	B	A	9	8	7	6	5	4	3	2	1
Engagement Chance (%) Vs new enemy w/ Knockdown Gauge difference >40	20	40	60	80	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100
Engagement Chance (%) Vs new enemy w/ equal Knockdown Gauge	0	0	0	0	0	20	40	60	80	100	100	100	100	100	100
Engagement Chance (%) Vs Preemptive attack	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	10	20	30	40	50

A brief explanation and example might be necessary, though. And the first row should ideally be more concise.

What the - darn, I got ninja'd. -.-

So I guess it's just preference over Akira's table and mine then. or not (double ninja'd?)

Okay, I'll add the table then lol. I better not get ninja'd :/

I'd still suggest the explanation and example, though. (And I thought, for the first one, it had to be a difference over 40, not equal to?)

Oh whoops. I'll change that quickly. Mind adding the explanation? I'm about to turn in for the night.