Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Want to make the wiki better? Contribute towards getting larger projects done on our Patreon!

The Titles page is awfully cluttered...

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Titles

Talent titles should be replaced with a link to the relevant page, but all the other changes are unnecessary.

Sozen Cratos Focker (talk)22:32, 22 August 2013

A semblance of organization is unnecessary?

What a world you live in...

Kave Johnson (talk)22:47, 22 August 2013

Other way around, breaking up the title page is a taboo, making new pages is not. If you want to make a page for str giving titles, another for int giving titles, etc, go on. But don't dissect this page.

Pyro - (Talk)00:48, 23 August 2013

Have to dissect it to make new pages.out of it...

And it still deserves a remodelling to have organize it better.

Kave Johnson (talk)06:22, 23 August 2013
 

What did we just say? Don't dissect this page.

If you want to make smaller more specific pages similar to what we do for enchants, that's fine, but don't break searching and sorting on this one.

Sozen Cratos Focker (talk)06:40, 23 August 2013

You have to dissect it to copy relevant information for the individual pages...

Oh, you're assuming that the information won't stay here.

lol

Kave Johnson (talk)08:06, 23 August 2013
 

You're either planning to piss us off, or misusing the word "dissect".

Sozen Cratos Focker (talk)11:50, 23 August 2013

dis·sect diˈsektdī- verb verb: dissect; 3rd person present: dissects; past tense: dissected; past participle: dissected; gerund or present participle: dissecting

   1.
   methodically cut up (a body, part, or plant) in order to study its internal parts

Mmm... as far as I can tell, no.

Maybe because I hadn't mentioned putting it all back after I copied it?

Kave Johnson (talk)12:11, 23 August 2013
 

I think you'd be better off just using the word analyze, not dissect. Dissection implies its irreparably disassembled. Either way, as long as the Titles page remains the same or nearly the same, go for it.

Pyro - (Talk)12:45, 23 August 2013
 

Maybe it does to you but 'dissect' is appropriate terminology as far as I can tell.

Kave Johnson (talk)13:14, 23 August 2013
 

Either way, term doesn't matter. Create a new page if you must but lets be conservative about the Titles page in this case.

Pyro - (Talk)13:25, 23 August 2013
 
 
 
 

Breaking up the page would be the opposite of organization. Having everything together makes it sortable and more easily searchable.

Sozen Cratos Focker (talk)23:25, 22 August 2013

We have a page for all enchants together, but we still have pages for individual rank enchants.

Is that not sortable?

And searchable?

Let's try this for example: Prefixe titles on their own page, regular titles on their own page, Talent titles on Talent and Destiny titles on Destiny... all connected by a Category:Titles page. Then individual pages for titles with specific benefits, like Enchant Modifiers pages.

Think that that is bad?

Kave Johnson (talk)23:42, 22 August 2013
 

That's mostly fine as long as we still have at least one page that has all regular titles and at least one that has all the secondary titles.

Talent Titles can go on a titles Disambiguation page since they have a similar name, but they don't belong in a Titles category.

Sozen Cratos Focker (talk)23:48, 22 August 2013

Then we're in agreement, and breaking up the Title page is not taboo.

Kave Johnson (talk)23:53, 22 August 2013