"Tradablilty" parameter changed?

This one isn't working somehow as it's written. Was this updated to "trade"...?

What do you mean?

Tradablilty was changed to Trade I believe

When I use [|tradability=n] for the book parameters, it still comes up as unknown.

You have to use |trade=(w/e)

Might want to have that fixed in the example template then... ^^;;;

Well it was just changed. =\ I'll do that.

I changed it to trade because it's a lot easier to spell.

Ok, just making sure. Also, I was looking at the tags... What does it mean when it's in the "NeedBook" category?

Lack of actual link the book material is on I think...

No, it means there isn't the use of Template:Book on the page, something Ikkisuki added.

Considering the overwhelming opposition to Template:Book, the category should be removed or purposed.

By purposed you mean? And why? There is literally no harm in having it.

There is no point in it, and it impends the readers ability to reference the text.

It doesn't impede anything. If it is really necessary we can just make the book collapsible and make it hidden be default.

Actually, it impends the reader because they have to click for more text instead of just scrolling down (which is much much easier). But if you hide it, Then what is the point of the template? Might as well remove it altogether.

You aren't providing any real options. 90% of the time removal should never be an option. I refuse to believe there isn't a solution where both of the readers can be happy. How about we just make both of them side by side?

I honestly don't see how Template:Book is helpful in any way. Instead, it just gets in the way for both the editors and readers. And if it is not helpful, it should be deleted.

That is purely opinion based.

It is not a matter of opinion, it is a matter of whether the template is useful. And no one, not even use, has ever explained that the template is useful.