Too much speculation and personal opinion

My proposed division and the "demigods", yeah, I guess haven't given a solid reason. So lemme say that it's for the sake of giving a sense of categorization that had been removed. This way it would clearly mark the more common gods, and shove off the less common gods into a trivia-like position that acknowledge their status here, but reminds that they're minor. The "demigods", I just thought their connection to gods should be acknowledged.

For re-promoting Glas, Lugh, or Cromm, I would think that the criteria outlined is enough of a qualifier to reinstate them, so wouldn't the onus be reversed now to anyone against this explaining why they're not good enough standard to use? (Though you're right that establishing what counts as "God" would be needed before that happens.)

As to listing the Gods' powers - why the heck not? Among the information you removed were real, concrete, and displayed facts that obviously come from each Gods' standing as one. This place is pretty much the only proper place that can actively note differences between the gods, you know, and that definitely gives a better understanding of "Gods" as a whole.

In kind of the same way, the trivia about Shakespeare is an inconsistency from the facts so far given about gods. There's no clear answer to this yet, and that should be acknowledged, and where better to place that tidbit than here?