Mabinogi World Wiki is brought to you by Coty C., 808idiotz, our other patrons, and contributors like you!!
Keep this wiki going by contributing to our Patreon!

Reorganization pending.

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Patches
 
 
@Shroom Fonzerelli - Just because something is hard to make look clean does not mean its an excuse to exclude that information.
 

 

Did you even bother reading the rest of his reply? No matter what you call it, you are referring to things that were not implemented when they were supposed to be. Who decides when they should be added, NA or KR? Saying that something was skipped based on KR will cause more incidents [this thread] to surface.

Yinato (talk)17:02, 12 June 2014

Yinato, you need not repeat yourself. Everyone in every discussion, including me, you, admins, have agreed that calling something "skipped" is incorrect and is player-opinion. However, we all agree that it is "unreleased", that neither means it will be released or will never be released. The question is whether we will include that on this page or its own page, which is a decision left up to admins, not you nor me. So please stop.

Kapra - (Talk)17:07, 12 June 2014

When in the name of Mother Mary who gave birth to Jesus Christ did I ever agree to renaming Skipped Content or that it was a "player opinion".

I wanted that thing gone, totally different from renaming it.

Mikaya wanted that thing gone as well and she's pretty much against any sort of Foreign Content. Unreleased is a different story however.

Kad said herself that she can't think of a good replacement for it and she was mostly up for removal on this page.

Yinato was also up with removal.

Nise Panda (talk)17:41, 12 June 2014
 

I said everyone agreed calling it skipped content is incorrect. I never said everyone agreed it should remain anywhere on the wiki or that it should be renamed. All to anything to a similar effect I said it that we all agree that such content is not released. Not that we should call it "unreleased", just that it is unreleased.

Kapra - (Talk)17:47, 12 June 2014
 

If everyone is in agreement, then why do you keep calling it skipped content? The reason why I'm repeating myself is because, although you say we're all in agreement on the matter, your comments say otherwise. And again, while you say that it's up the admins, you still continue to post why it should be on the page.

Yinato (talk)17:15, 12 June 2014
 
 
 
I agree, I really want to just rename "Skipped Content" into something more politically correct but it would be wrong to add or remove anything to the section until the admins say something decisive and final.
 

 



 
 
You don't have to tell me what Skipped Content's purpose was. If you look in the page's history, I was the one who added the section. (Yes I now regret using the term "Skipped" rather than something like "Unreleased".)
 

 



I continue to call it Skipped Content because the admins have yet to give it a new name. I sometimes call it Unreleased Content instead of Skipped Content, but that won't make a difference in discussion.

Yea you're right, I stopped and asked Lexis/the Admins to speak up, but you continue to post about this. That being said, if you reply to this, I probably will won't reply back.

Kapra - (Talk)17:22, 12 June 2014

It's fine if you don't answer, because this reply is only to give you advice. Stay consistent with your definitions and your arguments, and you'll avoid getting the above replies in the future.

Yinato (talk)17:59, 12 June 2014